A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications

Volume: 4, Issue: 3, Pages: 211 - 220
Published: Jul 1, 2010
Abstract
Combining different data sets with information on grant and fellowship applications submitted to two renowned funding agencies, we are able to compare their funding decisions (award and rejection) with scientometric performance indicators across two fields of science (life sciences and social sciences). The data sets involve 671 applications in social sciences and 668 applications in life sciences. In both fields, awarded applicants perform on...
Paper Details
Title
A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications
Published Date
Jul 1, 2010
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
211 - 220
Citation AnalysisPro
  • Scinapse’s Top 10 Citation Journals & Affiliations graph reveals the quality and authenticity of citations received by a paper.
  • Discover whether citations have been inflated due to self-citations, or if citations include institutional bias.