Outcomes of a Self-Regulated Learning Curriculum Model

Published on Oct 1, 2015in Science Education2.90
· DOI :10.1007/s11191-015-9769-3
Erin E. Peters-Burton7
Estimated H-index: 7
(GMU: George Mason University)
The purpose of this study was to describe connections among students’ views of nature of science in relation to the goals of a curriculum delivered in a unique setting, one where a researcher and two teachers collaborated to develop a course devoted to teaching students about how knowledge is built in science. Students proceeded through a cycle of self-regulated phases, forethought, performance, and self-reflection, during each segment of the curriculum: (a) independent research, (b) knowledge building in the discipline of science, and (c) a citizen science project. Student views were measured at the beginning and end of the course using epistemic network analysis. The pretest map reported student understanding of science as experimentation and indicated three clusters representing the durability of knowledge, empirical evidence, and habits of mind, which were loosely connected and represented knowledge generation as external to personal thinking. The posttest map displayed a broader understanding of scientific endeavors beyond experimentation, a shift toward personal knowledge generation, and indicated a larger number of connections among three more tightly oriented clusters: empirical evidence, habits of mind, and tentativeness. Implications include the potential to build curriculum that purposefully considers reinforcing cycles of learning of the nature of science in different contexts.
  • References (65)
  • Citations (3)
#1Feng Deng (NTU: Nanyang Technological University)H-Index: 8
#2Der Thanq "Victor" Chen (NTU: Nanyang Technological University)H-Index: 11
Last.Ching Sing Chai (NTU: Nanyang Technological University)H-Index: 22
view all 4 authors...
View next paperHigh School Exemplary Teachers’ Curriculum Knowledge