Match!
Ai & Society
Papers
1903
Papers 1894
1 page of 190 pages (1,894 results)
Newest
Last. Stephan Raaijmakers (LEI: Leiden University)H-Index: 1
view all 7 authors...
Within current debates about the future impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on human society, roughly three different perspectives can be recognised: (1) the technology-centric perspective, claiming that AI will soon outperform humankind in all areas, and that the primary threat for humankind is superintelligence; (2) the human-centric perspective, claiming that humans will always remain superior to AI when it comes to social and societal aspects, and that the main threat of AI is that humank...
Source
Source
Source
#1Xueliang (Sean) Li (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 1
#2Marco C. Rozendaal (TU Delft: Delft University of Technology)H-Index: 7
Last. Eric Vermetten (LUMC: Leiden University Medical Center)H-Index: 55
view all 5 authors...
We propose an approach to designing smart wearables that act as partners to help people cope with stress in daily life. Our approach contributes to the developing field of smart wearables by addressing how technological capabilities can be designed to establish partnerships that consider the person, the situation, and the appropriate type of support. As such, this study also contributes to healthcare by opening up novel technology-supported routes to stress treatment and care. We present the res...
Source
#1Karolina Zawieska (DMU: De Montfort University)
Over the past two decades, ethical challenges related to robotics technologies have gained increasing interest among different research and non-academic communities, in particular through the field of roboethics. While the reasons to address roboethics are clear, why not to engage with ethics needs to be better understood. This paper focuses on a limited or lacking engagement with ethics that takes place within some parts of the robotics community and its implications for the conceptualisation o...
Source
#1Wessel Reijers (EUI: European University Institute)H-Index: 1
Source
#1Huw Roberts (University of Oxford)H-Index: 1
#2Josh Cowls (University of Oxford)H-Index: 7
Last. Luciano Floridi (University of Oxford)H-Index: 47
view all 6 authors...
In July 2017, China’s State Council released the country’s strategy for developing artificial intelligence (AI), entitled ‘New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan’ (新一代人工智能发展规划). This strategy outlined China’s aims to become the world leader in AI by 2030, to monetise AI into a trillion-yuan ($150 billion) industry, and to emerge as the driving force in defining ethical norms and standards for AI. Several reports have analysed specific aspects of China’s AI policies or have asses...
2 CitationsSource
#1Kestutis Mosakas (VMU: Vytautas Magnus University)
While philosophers have been debating for decades on whether different entities—including severely disabled human beings, embryos, animals, objects of nature, and even works of art—can legitimately be considered as having moral status, this question has gained a new dimension in the wake of artificial intelligence (AI). One of the more imminent concerns in the context of AI is that of the moral rights and status of social robots, such as robotic caregivers and artificial companions, that are bui...
Source
#1Stephen D. Edwards (University of Zululand)H-Index: 10
Source
#1Alberto Romele (Lille Catholic University)H-Index: 2
The goal of this article is twofold. First, it aims at sketching the outlines of material hermeneutics as a three-level analysis of technological artefacts. In the first section, we introduce Erwin Panofsky’s three levels of interpretation of an artwork, and we propose to import this approach in the field of philosophy of technology. Second, the rest of the article focuses on the third level, with a specific attention towards big data and algorithms of artificial intelligence. The thesis is that...
Source
12345678910
Top fields of study
Sociology
Artificial intelligence
Performing arts
Computer science
Management science
Knowledge management