Match!
Lyn M. Shulha
Queen's University
24Publications
12H-index
631Citations
Publications 25
Newest
#1Elizabeth Whitmore (Carleton University)H-Index: 8
#2Hind Al Hudib (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 2
Last.Nathalie Gilbert (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
How do evaluators using collaborative approaches to evaluation (CAE) define success? This is the core question being asked in a further analysis of data from our previous work ( Cousins, Whitmore, & Shulha, 2013 ; Shulha et al., 2016) that developed a set of evidence-based principles to guide collaborative evaluation practice. Probing data from 320 responses to our (2012) survey, we examined what respondents considered “highly successful” and “less successful than hoped” in their collaborative e...
Source
#1Catherine Donnelly (Queen's University)H-Index: 7
#2Lyn M. Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 12
Last.Lori Letts (McMaster University)H-Index: 20
view all 4 authors...
Background Evaluation is a fundamental component in building quality primary care and is ideally situated to support individual, team and organizational learning by offering an accessible form of participatory inquiry. The evaluation literature has begun to recognize the unique features of KT evaluations and has described attributes to consider when evaluating KT activities. While both disciplines have focused on the evaluation of KT activities neither has explored the role of evaluation in KT. ...
2 CitationsSource
#1Chi Yan LamH-Index: 1
#2Catherine DonnellyH-Index: 7
Last.Lyn M. ShulhaH-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Lyn M. Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 12
#2Elizabeth Whitmore (Carleton University)H-Index: 8
Last.Hind Al Hudib (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
This article introduces a set of evidence-based principles to guide evaluation practice in contexts where evaluation knowledge is collaboratively produced by evaluators and stakeholders. The data from this study evolved in four phases: two pilot phases exploring the desirability of developing a set of principles; an online questionnaire survey that drew on the expertise of 320 practicing evaluators to identify dimensions, factors or characteristics that enhance or impede success in collaborative...
16 CitationsSource
#1Michelle Searle (Queen's University)H-Index: 4
#2Lyn M. Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 12
Abstract: Qualitative approaches in evaluation continue to expand, and this article focuses on the potential for the Arts to contribute to innovation in evaluation. Arts-informed inquiry is an approach that works within, augments, and extends traditional forms of qualitative approaches. This study documents an educational program evaluation that intentionally plans for, uses, and reflects upon artsinformed inquiry. Three considerations found central to arts-informed inquiry are presented: (a) wo...
Source
#1J. Bradley Cousins (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 24
#2Lyn M. Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 12
Last.Nathalie Gilbert (U of O: University of Ottawa)H-Index: 2
view all 5 authors...
Objectives: In this exploratory study, we wanted to know how evaluators differentiate collaborative approaches to evaluation (CAE) perceived to be successful from those perceived to be less-than-successful. Method: In an online questionnaire survey, we obtained 320 responses from evaluators who practice CAE (i.e., evaluations on which program stakeholders coproduce evaluation knowledge). Respondents identified two specific CAE projects from their own experience—one they believed to be “highl...
2 CitationsSource
#1Chi Yan Lam (Queen's University)H-Index: 1
#2Lyn M. Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 12
This article contributes to research on evaluation by examining the capacity and contribution of developmental evaluation for innovating. This case study describes the preformative development of an educational program (from conceptualization to pilot implementation) and analyzes the processes of innovation within a developmental evaluation framework. Developmental evaluation enhanced innovation by (a) identifying and infusing data primarily within an informing process toward resolving the uncer...
14 CitationsSource
#1Christopher DeLuca (Queen's University)H-Index: 16
#2Jason Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 1
Last.Don A. Klinger (Queen's University)H-Index: 17
view all 6 authors...
Collaborative inquiry (CI) has emerged as a dominant structure for educator professional learning in the twenty-first century. CI engages educators in collaboratively investigating focused aspects of their professional practice by exploring student responses to instruction, leading to new understandings and changes in classroom teaching. However, despite the increased presence of CI, research on CI frameworks has yet to be consolidated and synthesized. The purpose of this systematic, scoping rev...
17 CitationsSource
#1Lyn M. Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 12
Last.Nathalie GilbertH-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
#1Catherine Donnelly (Queen's University)H-Index: 7
#2Lori Letts (McMaster University)H-Index: 20
Last.Lyn M. Shulha (Queen's University)H-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
The evaluation literature has focused on the evaluation of knowledge translation activities, but to date there is little, if any, record of attempts to use evaluation in support of knowledge translation. This study sought to answer the question: How can an evaluation be designed to facilitate knowledge translation? A single prospective case study design was employed. An evaluation of a memory clinic within a primary care setting in Ontario, Canada, served as the case. Three data sources were use...
5 CitationsSource
123