scinapse is loading now...
Frederik Anseel
Ghent University
98Publications
21H-index
1,841Citations
Publications 98
Newest
Published on Jun 1, 2019in Journal of Personality 3.48
Roy B. L. Sijbom3
Estimated H-index: 3
(University of Amsterdam),
Jonas W. B. Lang12
Estimated H-index: 12
(Ghent University),
Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
(Ghent University)
Source Cite
Published on May 24, 2019in Journal of Management 8.08
Christian Vandenberghe32
Estimated H-index: 32
(HEC Montréal),
Guylaine Landry4
Estimated H-index: 4
+ 3 AuthorsPatrice Roussel9
Estimated H-index: 9
(University of Toulouse)
Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2019in Creativity and Innovation Management 1.55
Michaël J. J. P. S. Van Damme (Ghent University), Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
(Ghent University)
+ 1 AuthorsEric F. Rietzschel14
Estimated H-index: 14
(University of Groningen)
Pre‐implementation activities like idea selection play a crucial role in the innovation process. However, groups of people seem to perform rather poorly when it comes to selecting creative ideas for implementation. The Motivated Information Processing in Groups model (MIP‐G) provides an explanation as to why some groups outperform others when it comes to making group decisions. On the basis of the MIP‐G framework, we hypothesized that groups that are both epistemically and prosocially motivated ...
Source Cite
Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
(King's College London),
Lien Vossaert (Ghent University), Elias Corneillie (Ghent University)
Purpose This paper aims to extend the argument of DeNisi & Smith Sockbeson, who called to bridge the gap between feedback-seeking and feedback-giving research. The paper pushes their argument further by suggesting that future feedback research should systematically adopt a dyadic and dynamic approach to enhance the understanding of feedback episodes. Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews previous empirical work in the feedback domain and develops conceptual arguments for linking feedbac...
Source Cite
Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
(King's College London),
Saar Van Lysebetten1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Ghent University)
+ 1 AuthorsJulie Rosseel1
Estimated H-index: 1
(Ghent University)
ABSTRACTPrior to engaging in a substantive discussion on the supposed influence of neoliberalism on research in work and organizational psychology (WOP), it is important to verify the empirical basis of the trends advanced by Bal and Doci (Neoliberal ideology in work and organizational psychology, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology [Online First Publication, 2018]). To this end, we content analysed 745 abstracts of empirical studies published in leading WOP journals during th...
1 Citations Source Cite
Published on Mar 1, 2018in Journal of Organizational Behavior 4.23
Roy B. L. Sijbom3
Estimated H-index: 3
(University of Amsterdam),
Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
(Ghent University)
+ 2 AuthorsKatleen De Stobbeleir5
Estimated H-index: 5
(Katholieke Universiteit Leuven)
Summary We explore how the impact of seeking feedback from different sources (i.e., feedback source variety) on employee creativity is shaped by perceptions of the work environment. Specifically, we argue that two contextual factors, namely, performance dynamism (Study 1) and creative time pressure (Study 2), moderate the relationship between feedback source variety and creativity such that under conditions of high performance dynamism and low creative time pressure, individuals benefit from div...
2 Citations Source Cite
Published on Dec 14, 2017
Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
,
Karoline Strauss8
Estimated H-index: 8
(ESSEC Business School),
Filip Lievens51
Estimated H-index: 51
(Singapore Management University)
Source Cite
Published on Oct 1, 2017in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4.19
Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
Learning agility has been identified as one of the most important 21st century skills for sustainable careers. In recent years, research findings on reflection and feedback-seeking behavior, two closely related behavioral strategies driving learning agility have quickly accumulated. We summarize our current knowledge on these two agile learning strategies, identify ways how organizations can support them and explain how they work as two sides of the same coin. Our review shows that both reflecti...
3 Citations Source Cite
Published on Aug 1, 2017in Group & Organization Management 2.63
Alma M. Rodríguez-Sánchez7
Estimated H-index: 7
(James I University),
Toon Devloo4
Estimated H-index: 4
(Ghent University)
+ 2 AuthorsFrederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
(Ghent University)
The present study examines the mediational role of collective engagement in the relationship between team cohesion and team creative performance. A reciprocal process was expected to unfold across creativity task episodes: (a) team cohesion leads to collective task engagement, which in turn has a positive effect on team creative performance (perceived team performance and independently rated creativity), and (b) perceived team creative performance predicts the development of future team cohesion...
7 Citations Source Cite
Published on Aug 1, 2017
Julie Rosseel1
Estimated H-index: 1
,
Frederik Anseel21
Estimated H-index: 21
,
Bernd Carette6
Estimated H-index: 6
In the current paper, we argue that progress in reflection research is hindered by the holistic approach adopted in reflection interventions, making it difficult to identify the building blocks that make reflection interventions effective. On the basis of a theoretical analysis of reflection instructions used in previous research, we propose and test a new ‘building block’ framework distinguishing two dimensions: reflection strategy (i.e., task reflection vs. imaginative reflection) and reflecti...
1 Citations Source Cite
12345678910