Match!
Srikanth Paruchuri
Pennsylvania State University
30Publications
12H-index
992Citations
Publications 30
Newest
#1Razvan Lungeanu (NU: Northeastern University)H-Index: 3
#2Elena Vidal (Baruch College)H-Index: 4
Last.Charlotte Ren (TU: Temple University)H-Index: 5
view all 11 authors...
Source
#1Zeki Simsek (Clemson University)H-Index: 25
#2Eero Vaara (Aalto University)H-Index: 42
Last.Jason D. Shaw (NIE: National Institute of Education)
view all 5 authors...
Source
#1Snehal Awate (Indian School of Business)H-Index: 4
#2Srikanth ParuchuriH-Index: 12
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Srikanth Paruchuri (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 12
#2Timothy G. Pollock (UT: University of Tennessee)H-Index: 27
Last.Naveen Kumar (UW: University of Washington)H-Index: 4
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Micki Eisenman (HUJI: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)H-Index: 6
#2Srikanth Paruchuri (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 12
Abstract We study firms' abilities to increase the generative appropriability of their knowledge by studying the knowledge recombination patterns of inventors in the context of a merger between two equally sized pharmaceutical firms. Specifically, we study inventors' choices to recombine knowledge originating in the firm with which they merge. We hypothesize that mergers focus inventors' attention to units of knowledge originating in the other firm and that therefore, inventors will choose to re...
2 CitationsSource
#1Srikanth ParuchuriH-Index: 12
#2Martin C. GoossenH-Index: 1
Recent research has highlighted that organizations typically forget their older knowledge. But, does older organizational knowledge matter for firm innovation activities? And, who keeps older organization knowledge alive by recombining it in their innovation activities? To answer these theoretical question, we first examine how the age of the recombined knowledge influences the impact of the innovation on the firm's research activities. Second, we examine the conditions under which inventors rec...
Source
#1Srikanth Paruchuri (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 12
#2Jill E. Perry-Smith (Emory University)H-Index: 10
Last.Jason D. Shaw (PolyU: Hong Kong Polytechnic University)H-Index: 42
view all 4 authors...
2 CitationsSource
#1Razvan Lungeanu (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 3
#2Srikanth Paruchuri (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 12
Last.Wenpin Tsai (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 17
view all 3 authors...
Research Summary: Integrating research on independent philanthropy and organizational misconduct, we argue that affiliations with independent foundations provide social approval benefits for firms that restate their financials. We use a panel of S&P 500 companies from 2004 to 2011 to investigate the addition of foundation board ties by restating firms. CEOs of restating firms add more new foundation board ties than CEOs of non‐restating firms, while existing corporate philanthropy and greater co...
3 CitationsSource
#1Srikanth Paruchuri (PSU: Pennsylvania State University)H-Index: 12
#2Snehal Awate (Indian School of Business)H-Index: 4
Research summary: While firms tend to build on their own knowledge, we distinguish between depth and breadth of local search to investigate the drivers of these behaviors. Given that inventors in a firm carry out the knowledge creation activities, we strive to identify inventors responsible for these behaviors by employing the notion of an intra‐firm inventor network. A longitudinal examination of 14,575 inventors from four large semiconductor firms using patent data supports our hypotheses that...
26 CitationsSource
#1Srikanth ParuchuriH-Index: 12
#2Martin C. GoossenH-Index: 1
Source
123