Match!
Scott B. Dust
Miami University
BusinessPsychologyAbusive supervisionApplied psychologySocial psychology
27Publications
6H-index
181Citations
What is this?
Publications 29
Newest
#1Scott B. Dust (Miami University)H-Index: 6
#2Peng Wang (Miami University)
Last. Lei Lai (CSUDH: California State University, Dominguez Hills)
view all 3 authors...
This study explores how age and career stage affect receptivity to supervisor support using a multi-wave field sample of 528 employees. Following conservation of resources theory, we suggest that f...
Source
#1Scott B. Dust (Miami University)H-Index: 6
#2Megan W. Gerhardt (Miami University)H-Index: 9
Over time, the study of business and management has become increasingly specialized, to the point where leadership is understood to be a process, not a position. To understand how to teach this "influence process" perspective of leadership, we outline three priorities-rigor, reality, and relevance-and begin a conversation on challenges and opportunities for business leadership educators.
Source
#1Leonard Bierman (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 11
#2Rhett Andrew Brymer (UC: University of Cincinnati)H-Index: 5
Last. Hyunseok Hwang (A&M: Texas A&M University)H-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
Source
#1Xin Qin (SYSU: Sun Yat-sen University)H-Index: 7
#2Scott B. Dust (Miami University)H-Index: 6
Last. Song Wang (ZJU: Zhejiang University)
view all 4 authors...
Contributing to abusive supervision, creative leadership, and negative creativity research, we examine how and when leaders’ creative mindset relates to interpersonal aggression toward followers in the form of abusive supervision. Drawing upon moral disengagement theory, we theorize that leaders’ daily creative mindset positively relates to daily episodes of abusive supervision via state-based moral disengagement. Furthermore, we propose that trait-based moral disengagement moderates this indire...
Source
#1Scott B. Dust (Miami University)H-Index: 6
#2Maria Tims (UvA: University of Amsterdam)H-Index: 15
Source
#1Minya Xu (PKU: Peking University)H-Index: 6
#2Xin Qin (SYSU: Sun Yat-sen University)H-Index: 7
Last. Marco S. DiRenzo (NPS: Naval Postgraduate School)H-Index: 9
view all 4 authors...
Abstract Building on person-supervisor fit and signaling theory, this study explores the joint effects (i.e., congruence) of supervisor and subordinate proactive personality on subordinate voice behavior through subordinate perceived psychological safety. We examined our hypotheses using cross-level polynomial regressions and response surface analyses. The results indicated that supervisor-subordinate congruence in proactive personality led to higher levels of subordinate perceived psychological...
Source
#1Jared Weintraub (Hofstra University)
#2Murugan Pattusamy (University of Hyderabad)
Last. Scott B. Dust (Miami University)H-Index: 6
view all 3 authors...
ABSTRACTThis study seeks to disentangle the effect of polychronicity on work–home conflict, home–work conflict, and life satisfaction, by evaluating mindfulness as a moderator. We propose that mindfulness moderates the relationship between polychronicity and work–home and home–work conflict such that the relationship will be negative when mindfulness is high and positive when mindfulness is low. Additionally, we propose that mindfulness moderates the relationship between polychronicity and life ...
Source
#1Katrina A. Graham (Suffolk University)H-Index: 4
#2Mary B. Mawritz (Drexel University)H-Index: 10
Last. Jonathan C. Ziegert (Drexel University)H-Index: 12
view all 5 authors...
Abstract Across two studies, we explore the configurational effects of leader and follower dominance on dyadic relationship conflict and subsequent abusive supervision. Drawing from the central tenets of social dominance and interpersonal interaction theories, we propose that various leader-follower dominance combinations can incite abusive supervision via relationship conflict. We first suggest that when leaders and followers are both high on dominance, relationship conflict is likely to result...
Source
#1Jaclyn A. Margolis (Pepperdine University)H-Index: 2
#2Scott B. Dust (Miami University)H-Index: 6
We apply social comparison theory (SCT) to the organizational context and develop a model explicating the social comparison process that occurs within organizational teams. In doing so, we highlight how individual, team, and managerial factors influence this process. First, we discuss how task-related (e.g., functional background and experience) and demographic-related (e.g., age, gender, and race) team characteristics affect social comparison target selection (i.e., the team as a whole, a subgr...
Source
123