Match!
Alesia Zuccala
University of Copenhagen
37Publications
13H-index
596Citations
Publications 37
Newest
#1Helena H. Zhang (NU: Nanjing University)
#2Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
Last.Fred Y. Ye (NU: Nanjing University)H-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
Following the ‘black–white swan’ interaction metaphor introduced in an earlier study, we now trace and observe a new ‘swan groups’ pattern. Our motivation for introducing the ‘swan groups’ is based on the fact that ‘black–white swan’ interactions are observed primarily in physics, which belongs to science. We extend a newer model called ‘swan groups’ model and test its applicability to the field of economics, belonging to social sciences. The primary feature of this model is that the ‘black swan...
Source
#1Elea Giménez-Toledo (CSIC: Spanish National Research Council)H-Index: 8
#2Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez (CSIC: Spanish National Research Council)H-Index: 8
Last.Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
view all 9 authors...
In May 2016, an article published in Scientometrics, titled ‘Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries’, introduced a comparison of book evaluation schemes implemented within five European countries. The present article expands upon this work by including a broader and more heterogeneous set of countries (19 European countries in total) and adding new variables for comparison. Two complementary classification models were used to point out the commonalit...
4 CitationsSource
Just as citations to a book can be counted, so can that book's libcitations—the number of libraries in a consortium that hold it. These holdings counts per title can be obtained from the consortium's union catalog, such as OCLC's WorldCat. Librarians seeking to serve their customers well must be attuned to various kinds of merit in books. The result in WorldCat is a great variation in the libcitations particular books receive. The higher a title's count (or percentile), the more famous it is—eit...
2 CitationsSource
#1Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
#2Elea Giménez-Toledo (CSIC: Spanish National Research Council)H-Index: 8
Last.Ginevra Peruginelli (National Research Council)H-Index: 2
view all 3 authors...
Source
#1Emanuel Kulczycki (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań)H-Index: 7
#2Tim C. E. Engels (University of Antwerp)H-Index: 13
Last.Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
view all 11 authors...
This study investigates patterns in the language and type of social sciences and humanities (SSH) publications in non-English speaking European countries to demonstrate that such patterns are related not only to discipline but also to each country’s cultural and historic heritage. We investigate publication patterns that occur across SSH publications of the whole of the SSH and of economics and business, law, and philosophy and theology publications in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Fland...
27 CitationsSource
We describe the intellectual and physical properties of books as manifestations, expressions, and works and assess the current indexing and metadata structure of monographs in the Book Citation Index (BKCI). Our focus is on the interrelationship of these properties in light of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Data pertaining to monographs were collected from the Danish PURE repository system as well as the BKCI (2005–2015) via their International Standard Book Numb...
6 CitationsSource
In this chapter, we focus on the specialists who have helped to improve the conditions for book assessments in research evaluation exercises, with empirically based data and insights supporting their greater integration. Our review highlights the research carried out by four types of expert communities, referred to as the monitors, the subject classifiers, the indexers and the indicator constructionists. Many challenges lie ahead for scholars affiliated with these communities, particularly the l...
3 Citations
#1Saeed-Ul HassanH-Index: 10
#2Mubashir ImranH-Index: 2
Last.Alesia ZuccalaH-Index: 13
view all 3 authors...
#1Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
The chapter takes an external view of the Italian evaluation experience in SSH, as described in various chapters of this volume. It compares the choices made by the Italian Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca (ANVUR) to those of other countries, in light of the international literature on evaluation criteria, methodologies, and techniques. While not offering policy recommendations, the chapter articulates in a reflexive way the notion of research quality, a...
Source
#1Alesia Zuccala (UCPH: University of Copenhagen)H-Index: 13
#2Roberto CornacchiaH-Index: 3
This paper details a unique data experiment carried out at the University of Amsterdam, Center for Digital Humanities. Data pertaining to monographs were collected from three autonomous resources, the Scopus Journal Index, WorldCat.org and Goodreads, and linked according to unique identifiers in a new Microsoft SQL database. The purpose of the experiment was to investigate co-varied metrics for a list of book titles based on their citation impact (from Scopus), presence in international librarie...
10 CitationsSource
1234