Icons / Logo / Facebook Created with Sketch. Icons / Logo / Google Created with Sketch. Icons / Logo / ORCID Created with Sketch. Branding/Logomark minus Citation Combined Shape Icon/Bookmark-empty Icon/Copy Icon/Collection Icon/Close Copy 7 no author result Created with Sketch. Icon/Back Created with Sketch. Match!
Peter Marcus Kristensen
University of Copenhagen
18Publications
5H-index
102Citations
Publications 18
Newest
Published on Feb 21, 2019in European Journal of International Relations 2.76
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
This article examines the relationship between the geopolitical rise of new powers in international relations and knowledge production in International Relations. It draws on the science studies literature on the ‘co-production’ of science and politics to conceptualise and analyse this relationship between the ‘state of emergence’ and ‘state of knowledge’. I argue that the ‘state of emergence’ should be conceptualised not only as a real-world condition external to science that imposes itself on ...
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
The sociology of international relations (IR) around the world has evolved from an initial wave of critiques of its dominant American core towards a second wave of peripheral explorations that find IR to be disappointingly similar around the world. Advancing a more recent wave that stresses Southern sensibilities, hybridity and peripheral agency, this article calls for attention to the heterogeneities, positionality struggles and vernacularisations of sociological hierarchies in peripheral IR. T...
Published on Sep 1, 2018in European Political Science 1.14
Mads Christian Dagnis Jensen7
Estimated H-index: 7
(RU: Roskilde University),
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
This article examines four lines of scholarly difference in European Union (EU) studies – meta-theoretical, (sub)disciplinary, epistemological and methodological – and whether these are linked to the geographical and institutional affiliations of the authors operating in the field. The study uses a novel dataset based on a quantitative content analysis and human coding of 1597 articles in leading journals dealing with the EU published in the period 2003–2012. The article shows that USA-based sch...
Published on Jul 1, 2018
Yongjin Zhang9
Estimated H-index: 9
(UoB: University of Bristol),
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
Published on May 3, 2018in International Studies Quarterly 2.17
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
Published on Mar 1, 2018
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen),
Pippa Morgan2
Estimated H-index: 2
(Fudan University)
Published on Dec 1, 2017
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
American observers of international affairs are currently enmeshed in a debate on the future of global order and leadership. For at least a decade, it has been debated whether the global center of power and leadership is gradually shifting away from the ‘declining’ West towards ‘rising’ powers like the BRICS and what consequences this may have for global order, governance and leadership. This paper examines this ongoing debate on the future of global leadership among American observers of intern...
Published on Dec 1, 2017in The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2.34
Yongjin Zhang9
Estimated H-index: 9
(UoB: University of Bristol),
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
Published on Jun 1, 2016in European Journal of International Relations 2.76
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
The International Relations discipline has recently witnessed a wave of stocktakings and they surprisingly often follow the narrative that the discipline once revolved around all-encompassing great debates, which, either neatly or claustrophobically depending on the stocktaker, organized the discipline. Today, most stocktakers argue, International Relations has moved beyond great debate — the very symbol of the discipline — and is undergoing fragmentation. For some scholars, fragmentation is cau...
Published on Jan 1, 2016
Peter Marcus Kristensen5
Estimated H-index: 5
(UCPH: University of Copenhagen)
Globalizing International Relations sets out to critically examine divides and diversity in the discipline, both within and beyond its ‘Western’ core. It is an important contribution to the sociology of the International Relations (IR) discipline by both contributing to the longstanding literature on the parochialism of the mainstream American IR discipline (Hoffmann 1977; Holsti 1985; Waever 1998; Smith 2000; Crawford and Jarvis 2001) and its colonial legacies (Long and Schmidt 2005), as well a...
123