Match!
Philip M. Podsakoff
University of Florida
80Publications
53H-index
61kCitations
Publications 80
Newest
#1Philip M. Podsakoff (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 5
#2Nathan P. Podsakoff (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 21
Abstract Despite the renewed interest in the use of experimental designs in the fields of leadership and management over the past few decades, these designs are still relatively underutilized. Although there are several potential reasons for this, chief among them is misunderstanding the value of these designs. The purpose of this article is to review the role of laboratory, field, and quasi-experimental designs in management and leadership research. We first discuss the primary goals of experim...
#1John Antonakis (UNIL: University of Lausanne)H-Index: 30
#2George C. Banks (UNCC: University of North Carolina at Charlotte)H-Index: 21
Last.S. Alexander Haslam (UQ: University of Queensland)H-Index: 67
view all 10 authors...
The Leadership Quarterly has developed the reputation of being the custodian of the best multidisciplinary scientific research focusing on leadership. This reputation has been the result of the efforts of successive editorial teams who laid important foundations in building the journal (see joint article from former editors: Atwater, Mumford, Tosi, & Yammarino, 2014). We are passionate about scientific discovery and aspire to publish the best leadership research, on par with that of the top gene...
#1Philip M. Podsakoff (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 53
#2Nathan P. PodsakoffH-Index: 21
Last.Carly Escue (UF: University of Florida)
view all 4 authors...
Given the disproportionate influence that high-impact articles have on the field of management, it is not surprising that PhD students trying to establish themselves early in their careers would li...
#1Philip M. Podsakoff (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 53
#2Scott B. MacKenzie (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 47
Last.Nathan P. Podsakoff (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 21
view all 3 authors...
#1Nathan P. Podsakoff (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 21
#2Philip M. Podsakoff (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 53
Last.Trevor M. Spoelma (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 2
view all 6 authors...
#1Scott B. MacKenzie (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 47
#2Nathan P. Podsakoff (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 21
Last.Philip M. Podsakoff (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 53
view all 3 authors...
#1Philip M. Podsakoff (UF: University of Florida)H-Index: 53
#2Scott B. MacKenzie (IU: Indiana University)H-Index: 47
Last.Nathan P. Podsakoff (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 21
view all 3 authors...
#1Philip M. Podsakoff (College of Business Administration)H-Index: 5
#2Scott B. MacKenzie (IU: Indiana University Bloomington)H-Index: 47
Last.Nathan P. Podsakoff (UA: University of Arizona)H-Index: 21
view all 3 authors...
Despite the importance of establishing good, clear concept definitions in organizational research, the field lacks a comprehensive source that explains how to effectively develop and articulate a concept’s domain. Thus, the purpose of this article is to explain why clear conceptual definitions are essential for scientific progress and provide a concrete set of steps that researchers can follow to improve their conceptual definitions. First, we define what is meant by a concept, describe the func...
#2Scott B. MacKenzieH-Index: 47
Last.Richard FetterH-Index: 3
view all 4 authors...
12345678910